Real results from real teams
See how product, design, and engineering teams use VertaaUX to ship better UX consistently. Each case study covers the challenge, approach, and measurable outcomes.
SecureBank Group
How SecureBank Group Integrated UX Quality into Governance Workflows
12
Teams onboarded
99.2%
SLA adherence
SecureBank Group, a financial services firm with 12 product teams building customer-facing digital banking interfaces, had no standardized way to measure or enforce UX quality. Each team followed different design patterns, accessibility standards varied between squads, and customer-reported UX bugs had increased 35% year-over-year. Leadership wanted to establish UX quality as a governance metric alongside security and performance SLAs, but lacked tooling to measure quality consistently across teams and enforce thresholds without creating bottlenecks.
CloudFlow
How CloudFlow Achieved WCAG 2.2 AA Compliance Across 200+ Views
200+
Views audited
94%
Issue resolution rate
CloudFlow, a project management SaaS platform used by 800+ enterprise teams, faced a hard compliance deadline. Several of their largest customers required WCAG 2.2 AA compliance as a procurement condition, and a pending EU accessibility directive meant non-compliance would risk contract renewals worth seven figures annually. Their application had over 200 unique views across dashboards, settings, reporting, and collaboration features. A manual accessibility audit of even the highest-traffic views would have taken their three-person accessibility team an estimated six months.
NordicShop
How NordicShop Reduced UX Regressions by 60% with CI/CD Audits
60%
Fewer UX regressions
3x
Faster audit cycles
NordicShop, a Nordic e-commerce platform serving 2.3 million monthly active users across five markets, was shipping UX regressions faster than their QA team could catch them. With bi-weekly sprint releases touching 40+ frontend components, visual inconsistencies, broken accessibility, and conversion-killing layout shifts were reaching production regularly. Their manual QA process caught only a fraction of issues, and the feedback loop from customer complaints to engineering fixes averaged 11 days.