This is a representative example of a VertaaUX audit report. Real reports include interactive elements, full issue lists, and downloadable PDFs.
This score reflects 5 critical issues, 8 moderate issues, and 3 minor issues detected across 7 evaluation dimensions.
Images without alternative text are inaccessible to screen reader users. This violates WCAG 2.1 Level A requirements.
Add descriptive alt attributes to all images. For decorative images, use alt=''.
Primary call-to-action buttons have a contrast ratio of 3.2:1, below the WCAG AA requirement of 4.5:1.
Increase contrast by darkening button text or lightening background. Current: #7C7C7C on #E0E0E0. Suggested: #4A4A4A on #E0E0E0 (4.6:1).
6 form fields rely on placeholder text instead of proper label elements, making them difficult to use with assistive technology.
Replace placeholder-only inputs with visible <label> elements or aria-label attributes.
Dropdown menu cannot be opened or navigated using keyboard alone. Users relying on keyboard navigation cannot access submenu items.
Add keyboard event handlers (onKeyDown) for Enter/Space to toggle menu, and arrow keys to navigate items.
No skip link present, forcing keyboard users to tab through entire navigation on every page.
Add a "Skip to main content" link as the first focusable element: <a href="#main" class="sr-only focus:not-sr-only">Skip to main content</a>
VertaaUX uses a headless browser to render the target page, then runs five parallel audit modules — Usability, Clarity, Information Architecture, Accessibility, and Conversion — each grounded in WCAG 2.2, Nielsen's usability heuristics, and conversion research. Findings include a confidence score indicating deterministic (rule-based) vs. AI-assisted detection.
Get detailed, actionable insights like these for your website in under 60 seconds. Start with a free audit—no credit card required.
A VertaaUX audit report includes a 7-dimension score summary (usability, clarity, information architecture, accessibility, performance, visual design, mobile responsiveness), a prioritised list of issues with severity levels (critical, warning, info), WCAG 2.2 criterion references, CSS selectors for each finding, and actionable fix guidance. Reports can be exported as JSON or PDF.
A UX audit measures usability (task completion, navigation clarity), content clarity (readability, hierarchy), information architecture (link structure, labelling), accessibility (WCAG 2.2 compliance), performance (load time, Core Web Vitals), visual design (consistency, spacing), and mobile responsiveness (viewport behaviour, touch targets). Each dimension produces a 0-100 score.
Start with the overall scores to identify the weakest dimensions. Then review critical-severity issues first — these affect the most users. Each issue includes a description, the affected element (CSS selector), the relevant standard (e.g. WCAG 1.4.3), and a recommended fix. Address critical issues before warnings to maximise impact per fix.